Some opponents of the hunt say that the bison have no fear of humans and hunters will be able to approach too close to kill the animals and that it is not sporting. Anti-hunting groups have ran ads and say that it is as sporting as "... shooting a parked truck." So far this has not deterred the State that is concerned for its cattle industry.
Miniter points out that the anti-hunters paint an edenic picture of Indians on horseback with bows, killing bison in a "sporting" hunt - an image that he identifies as a myth. Miniter uses the example of an archaeological site, Head-Smashed-In Buffalo Jump in Canada, where "sporting" Indians regularly stampeded bison over a cliff as their mode of hunting.
Miniter has a point. Bison jumps are a common type of archaeological site on the Plains.
This "river of bone" is from the Olsen-Chubbuck site in Eastern Colorado. Evidence here shows that in a single episode on a day 10,150 years ago, a herd of an extinct form of bison, Bison occidentalis, was stampeded by Indians across an arroyo, killing 193 of them. The Indians obviously had good feasting for a time after that, but about 40 of the carcasses were never touched, left to rot. "Sporting" doesn't always mean much to hunters with primitive technology and families to feed.
UPDATE
I wish to revise and extend my remarks based on Larissa and Mary's comments. I believe that the State of Montana is doing the right thing under the circumstances. The only other rational alternative is to have Montana officials shoot them. The State should spare the expense and gain the revenue by allowing the hunt. I believe that the assertion that the hunt should be stopped because it is not sporting is an ahistorical canard brought to you by the crowd that says, "Hunting won't be sporting until the animals are armed."
In prehistory, Native Americans killed bison any way that they could, with drives, jumps, traps, corrals, just as they did with pronghorn and deer. Renowned archaeologist George Frison gives you a good rundown here and here of the techniques, their history, and their effectiveness. After the reintroduction of the horse to North America by Europeans, there was a brief period of time, perhaps 200 years out of the 14,000 or so they have been here, when mounted Native Americans could actually pursue bison in an effective manner. They could run bison in a "sporting" manner if they chose. Usually they didn't when they got firearms. This manifestation of what we think of as typical Plains Indian culture is anything but typical when viewed in context of their entire occupation of North America.
Mary is exactly right about the hide hunters of the 1870s and 1880s. Francis Haines has a good rundown of their technique here. The bison had such strong herd instinct and were so near-sighted that hunters could easily approach within 40 to 50 yards of them. They soon learned that shooting from that range was a mistake because the sound of the gunshot would scare the other animals away. The hide hunter set up a stand 300 yards or so away where he could pick off several animals who would be oblivious to the sound of the gun. In this manner they annihilated millions of animals.
Frankly, the description of how contemporary hunters will hunt bison sounds pretty much like the Nineteenth century version to me. And what are you going to do unless you want to have say, mounted bow-hunting of bison (I bet there'd be lots of takers!) and then the objectors would just object on other grounds.
Mary is also right about the logistics of bison butchering - it's a big chore. Haines talks about that as well. A vivid and accurate description of how the hunters and skinners worked is in Michael Gear's novel Long Ride Home. Mike does a good job telling you things that wouldn't have occurred to you: like how the skinners were perpetually plagued with fleas, ticks, and other vermin that came out of the bison hair.
7 comments:
......That's a lot of dead bison.
Hi, this is Sophia Rogers. I would have just emailed you, but I couldn't find your address, so here I am:) We were corresponding for a while, and I kind of lost touch. (My last letter dealt with a house fire and my new siamese fighting fish, but I never sent it for some reason. It was back in 1999, I think.)
I just found your website. I'll bookmark it.
I guess there's not much point in trying to fill you in for the past years...I took a lot of family road trips out west, and went to China for a month. (China was great.) As of now, I'm a 3rd year Character Animation student at California Institute of the Arts. I'm hoping to become a story or visual development artist (for Pixar, yeah!!!)
Sometimes, when I'm feeling especially masochistic, I'll look at websites with hawking birds for sale. I haven't given up on falconry, but for me, it's a thing of the distant future. Sometimes I wonder how my life might have turned out, if falconry had only been legal in Delaware.^^
-Sophia (aka Moro) Rogers
Moroturkey@hotmail.com
Oh, er, haha, that was directed at Mr. Bodio. (Sorry!!)
It's my impression that when bison were hunted for meat by hunters who had guns, they could shoot from cover and if they were careful, drop individual bison without spooking the group into running. This is more about marksmanship than about "hunting." "Hunting" would seem to cover the whole process of looking for sign, spotting animals, creeping up on them, and so on. Thus, hunting for the animals. With big herds of bison on the prairie or even modern clusters leaving the protection of Yellowstone Park, the problem is not so much hunting for them -- they are already found -- as not spooking them. Of course they are accustomed to people being around, but they are not cows: they will attack with no notice though tourists never believe it. Will critics be happier if some hunters are killed?
but Reid, what is your opinion on the subject? I get that it's a bummer to unportingly kill bison wandering around oblivious to danger, and that it wold also be a bummer for the bison to infect nearby cattle with some appalling disease. What do you think should be done?
It's entertaining that the Montana Fish and Wildlife are releasing one
announcement after another cautioning the prospective bison hunters to
plan ahead what they are going to do about their bison once they have
killed it. They're being told they will need a "team" of "several" to
help gut, skin, cut up and carry out (! What? Carry out???) 2,000
pounds of inert meat.
A few years ago, for a class in traditions, Blackfeet Community College
sponsored a workshop in processing one of the tribal buffs. Someone
else shot it and brought it to the campus where rotating teams of
students spent the whole day working on it. Until then they had not
quite considered how big even the gut pile would be nor that someone
was probably going to have to climb completely into the carcass to get
that cavity cleaned out. A whole green buffalo hide is impossible for
one person to pick up, which explains why the old-timers generally
split them down the spine. I never heard whether some daring soul
dabbed a bit of gall onto raw liver to see why it was considered a
delicacy.
Of course, the hunters will need to wear gloves and other protection in
case the bison they shoot has brucellosis. A Crow Indian man who
helped his people out by butchering one of those Yellowstone buffs told
a panel of Association for the Study of Literature and the Environment
that he spent the winter on his back on the sofa after being infected.
Never simple...
Prairie Mary
I enjoyed reading some of your posts ##NAME##. I was looking for scopes related information and found your blog. I have a scopes site. You can find everything about hunting rifles, scopes, bows, feeders, stands, guides for trips and more. Come and check it out if you get time! :-)
Thanks for sharing this information. I found it very informative as I have been researching a lot lately on practical matters such as you talk about..
horseback hunting
Post a Comment