This NYT story suggests that the way Starlings process and arrange sounds may illuminate the origins of speech.
Some prominent linguists, including Noam Chomsky, disagree (and Chomsky's linguistics make a lot more sense than his politics). But a defender of the experiments dismisses Chomsky.
"Chomsky may find this trivial, but that is a bit like saying apes use tools, but only the trivial kind that lack the sophistication of a tri-square or a laser level," he said."
John Hawks has more to say on his Anthropology Blog, here andhere.
No comments:
Post a Comment